Talk:Park Si-eun (entertainer)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Elli in topic Requested move 3 June 2021

Requested move 3 June 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 21:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


– As of her debut with STAYC, she uses the mononym Si-eun. Entertainer should be changed to Singer, as she’s now only active as a singer. 2001 should be included to distinguish her from those that share the same name. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@162 etc.: Oppose per WP:PTOPIC. Those article titles need no birth year as disambiguation. -St3095 (?) 05:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • In support of moving the title to Si-eun (entertainer, born 2001) but not of keeping Park Si-eun. 52-whalien (talk) 04:06, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. It is proposer's responsibility to explain why the subject needs a mononym. Link to some published sources, give us some sort of argument, something. All I see is, "As of her debut with STAYC, she uses the mononym Si-eun." We should give her a new name because she joined a band? The Korean press refers to singers in a certain style, but she hasn't changed her name. She did a drama last year as "Park Si-eun," according to Han Cinema.
I pulled up one of the article's references at random: "하이업엔터 측 "박시은, 당사 소속이지만 전속계약은 NO"(공식입장)" (Hi-Up Entertainment side Park Si-eun belongs to our company, but no exclusive contract" (official position)). That doesn't look like a mononym to me. That the "mononym" version of the name is actually longer than the current full-name version is pretty goofy. 99to99 (talk) 01:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.