Talk:Stavesacre

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Retswerb in topic Supergroup?
Former good articleStavesacre was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 11, 2016Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Music classification

edit

Should Stavesacre really be listed as "Christian Rock"? That is a label that they have fought to shed. I would list them as simply a rock band and perhaps somewhere in the article discuss the faith of the band, but make it clear that they are not a "CCM" brand. --Wugmanmax (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article redesign

edit

I have redesigned the article layout, adding section headers for History, Discography & videography and Band members (including Former members). I also added a band bio box and a table for the discography. Andy 18:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nice job for a band that deserves it. PhilipR 02:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Choosing the name?

edit

Should it be mentioned somewhere that the name was chosen by picking a random word in the dictionary. I think it was either Bellew or Solomon that did it. 68.63.248.123 20:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

As I recall the story, it was Bellew. Go ahead and stick it in, I think it's noteworthy. But we need a source.--Velvet elvis81 06:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

GAN on hold

edit
  • The image is replaceable fair use, which isn't allowed (see WP:NFCC#4a). I found nothing on Flickr
  • The lead really should be expanded to 2+ paragraphs
  • "however, are currently" - probably best to just start a new sentence here
  • "played in The Blamed" - make note here that it's a band
  • "Salomon enjoyed the owners." - enjoyed working with the owners?
  • Add a wlink for Stephen Thomas Erlewine
  • "the band toured for nearly two years and grew immensely tired of the touring" - overuse of "touring"...use a different word
  • Infobox says they're still active, yet you say they've broken up? (Also needs mention in the lead.)

Leave me a note when done. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 01:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Passed. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Stavesacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Supergroup?

edit

Are Stavesacre truly a supergroup as described in the lede? I know most of the members had associations with other bands but it seems like Stavesacre doesn't fit the typical understanding of a supergroup. Retswerb (talk) 06:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I would argue that if a source can't be found to support the term, it would be appropriate to remove. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Done. Retswerb (talk) 05:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply