Talk:Peter Behrens

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cl3phact0 in topic Behrens AEG clock photograph


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Landhaus (talkcontribs) 12:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Plagiarism

edit

Parts of this article--at least a significant portion of the second to last paragraph in the Biography section (beginning with "In 1936 Behrens was called from Vienna...")--are taken directly from Stanford Anderson's "Peter Behrens and a New Architecture for the Twentieth Century" (2000). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Landhaus (talk • contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.94.133.4 (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Peter Behrens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Behrens AEG clock photograph

edit

There is another version of this photo which may be slightly better (no background). Perhaps it could be used rather than the current version? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 17:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply