 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editthis article is just an advert? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.89.239 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Apologies we will try to change any feel of advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grouphcis (talk • contribs) 13:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
I definetly agree, poor reference, nothing as references provided for data... Well, poor article regarding encyclopedia standards.Pierreangy (talk) 10:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to "NikeID": no dissent. DrKiernan (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
NIKEiD → NikeiD – Reliable sources show a slight preference for the non-trademarked variant. NikeiD: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], www.exm.nr/PhxE1V [8] [9] [10], mixed use: www.exm.nr/NZGZoO. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 12:40, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 10:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- NikeID would seem to make more sense and better fit our guidelines (since it's presumably pronounced "NYE-kee EYE DEE"). Powers T 14:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support as per MOS:TM. Zarcadia (talk) 11:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Unrelated - can someone check sources for VOILÀ Hotel Rewards please. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- If it's unrelated, why did you put it here? Powers T 01:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'd also prefer NikeID. Looking through gnews, the current title seems to be the most common variant, but there are some sources that use NikeID ([11] [12] are some examples) and, as Powers says, that title makes better sense. Jenks24 (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.