Talk:Markéta Vondroušová

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Markéta Vondroušová. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Markéta Vondroušová/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 21:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Going to be taking a look at this article. MWright96 (talk) 21:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

Early life and background

edit

Junior career

edit

2014–17: Maiden WTA title at 17, top 100 debut

edit

2018–19: Teenage French Open finalist, world No. 14

edit

Playing style

edit

Coaches

edit

Personal life

edit

References

edit
  • There are several references that are lacking the authors, publication dates of the works and the names of the newspapers/websites that published them. Those will need to be included.

This article has some issues, some minor and some major. For minor issues, there are a few grammar issues and one main issue is with missing data from several of the references used in the article. Another big issue is the unverified statements, whether it be the sources not matching at all due to the incorrect one being used. Will put the review on hold. MWright96 (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, MWright96! I addressed everything above, and agreed with most of it. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply