Quality standards

edit

I moved most of the content from the intro to the actual body of the article. Hopefully this will help it comply.

Accent

edit

I'm taking out the clause "In spite of her country allure, Nash never developed an accent" as it's a) completely meaningless, as everyone has an accent; b) unnecessary in the context of the paragraph in which it appears; and c) subjective - who is to say that the teenaged Nash had "country allure" and what does this mean anyway? 85.118.29.202 (talk) 13:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Christianity?

edit

Um... I see that Nash is described as a Christian before anything else, and am curious as to why this is deemed to be of primary importance. I have never seen any other article with that kind of beginning. How is her religion relevant, and can (should) this be changed to instead read "is an American singer and composer, best known as the lead vocalist for the rock band Sixpence None the Richer[1]."? LordAmeth 07:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Um... Christianity is what she is and puts into all her music. Read the lyrics. And search a little harder and you will find articles on here starting with a person or a band's Christianity, when they are a Christian artist or band. Also, you will find many articles on her Christianity on the net. Ever thought of searching Wikipedia or the Christian Media or are there lazy wiki researchers on here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.22.182 (talk) 02:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Personally, I think leading with Leigh's affirmation of her Christian faith is altogether appropriate. Leigh Nash, along with SIXPENCE NONE THE RICHER'S founder, Matt Slocum, have both made much of how they prefer to be known as 'Christians in a band'; this as opposed to being a 'Christian Band'. Their decision to market themselves in this fashion was expressed by their desire to maximize exposure/circulation while affording them the prerogative to write/sing about whatever they wish. Notwithstanding, both parties have been quick to affirm their Christianity & its significant influence in their music. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.66.111 (talk) 19:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Fauxliage.jpg

edit
 

Image:Fauxliage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

New Photos

edit

I've got some Leigh Nash photos I've taken that I'd be happy to contribute. You can look at them here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevewhite/tags/leighnash/. Thanks Echobase 2000 (talk) 04:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:Fauxliage-front.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Age?

edit

The article says that Ms. Nash was born in 1976. Then it is said that the first album was released when she was 16. That would date the first album to 1992. But the first Sixpence album was released in 1994 which would make Ms. Nash 18 years old. It does not add up.Tishbite37 (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • I think this as been fixed. 1) Age was changed to 17. 2) Must look at months also when posting age. Born June 27, 1976 and first Sixpence album released April 26, 1994. Thank you. Telecine Guy (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Fall 2009

edit

"Leigh will join Open Wings-Broken Strings tour in 2009 fall, along with Eddie Kowalczyk of Live, Art Alexakis of Everclear. After that Leigh will back to Sixpence to jump into the studio to record a new album." Oh will 2009 never come? 188.238.122.249 (talk) 07:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Small Para Rewrite needed

edit

Leigh has since rejoined Sixpence and worked on a new EP My Dear Machine EP,[5] and the Christmas album The Dawn of Grace with tour dates planned throughout 2008 in the States and Europe. Tess Wiley is also back to support Sixpence's European tour.
Clearly, a dated passage ("... with events planned throughout 2008..."). I'm not familiar enough with Nash's 2008 events to best rewrite it, but thought I'd call it to the attention of someone more in touch with events she's connected to. 167.230.96.9 (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Leigh Nash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leigh Nash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply