Talk:Jamie Foster

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Current club

edit

Is he still at Saints, the infobox is unclear and as he doesn't appear in the bit at the bottom of the screen it does not make it clear to the new reader such as myself as to whether he still plays for St Helens. Lando09 (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's clear he still plays for Saints in the way it says, in the article's lead:
James "Jamie" Foster (born on the 27th July 1990) is a professional Rugby League player who plays for St Helens RLFC in the European Super League.
Also, the infobox reflects this by leaving '2007–' to confirm he his still playing for Saints at present. There is simply no need for a field in the infobox giving his current club when this information already appears on this article twice, on this article once and on this article too. Also, all biographical articles should aim for consistency, and using the template that is used in almost all other rugby league biographies, and has lead an article to appearing on Wikipedia's main page would conform to this. GW(talk) 11:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jamie Foster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply