Talk:E. W. Bastard

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Cricket: Somerset Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Somerset County Cricket Club task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

E. W. Bastard has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 25, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 2, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a Bastard at Oxford University once dismissed Australian cricket captain Billy Murdoch?

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:E. W. Bastard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sarastro1 (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

A good piece of work. I've done a quick copy-edit and cleared up a few points. Also, I cut a few phrases I thought were unnecessary. Anything you aren't happy with, feel free to revert. Just a few questions before I pass:

"often said to be the university's best ever": Said by who?

This is a difficult one, because Bolton says that it is often said.. but I seem to recall something in Altham and Swanton.

I've changed this slightly, and reffed Altham and Swanton. Harrias ^talk 20:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"placed him among the 20 most prolific bowlers in the country": In terms of average or number of wickets?

Wickets: I tend to figure that "prolific" signifies quantity, but I can see that it's still ambiguous, I'll clean up.

Changed to "among the 20 most prolific wicket-takers in the county" - does that make it clearer? Harrias ^talk 20:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"along with the acquisitions of Ted Tyler and George Nichols": Acquisition or acquisitions (I'm not sure here).

I'd say plural; they came from different sources at different times.

The matches against OUCC first team: were they trial games or practice games?

No idea, I only have the CricketArchive scorecards for them; they aren't mentioned in Bolton.

Bolton blamed the weather for the loss: did it rain? If so, maybe mention the sticky wicket.

I've expanded upon this a bit: feel free to tidy the language. Harrias ^talk 20:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"in 1884 as part of the team which has often been described as Oxford's best ever.": Described by who?

As above.

"scored 52 runs in "quick time"" Attribution in text is needed.

Wasn't too keen on this looking back at it: have changed to simply "scored 52 runs quickly," Harrias ^talk 20:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Bastard "bowled with great skill on the last morning"" Again, needs attribution.

Added. Harrias ^talk 20:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Somerset could only field nine men in the fixture": How did that happen? (Sorry, I've got to ask!)

I can't give you a cited answer. I guess slightly more than I probably should in the Somerset County Cricket Club in 1885 article: I think probably a combination of their poor form, and bad luck.

Everything else checks out.

I won't bother to put this on hold unless you haven't been able to get to it before tomorrow evening. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've offered a few quick replies, and will fix what I can in a bit. Harrias ^talk 20:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

All fine now, good to go. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic