Talk:Circumpolar peoples

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Tropylium in topic Purpose

Requested move 19 December 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a clear consensus against the proposed title. SmokeyJoe has made a case for "Arctic peoples" that might be worth pursuing in a new RM. Jenks24 (talk) 12:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply



The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Purpose

edit

So what is the point of this article anyway? It seems like a rather arbitrary grouping, and gives no information that would be generally applicable; a weird cross between a list (as such a fork of a List of indigenous peoples) and general analysis (though so far only concerning the Inuit). There might be grounds for a separate article, but as it stands this is superfluous entirely. --Trɔpʏliʊmblah 17:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Actually, please see → Talk:List of indigenous peoples. --Trɔpʏliʊmblah 18:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Former category

edit

These pages were in Category:Indigenous peoples in the Arctic, deleted per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 15#Peoples of the Arctic:

Pages in Category:Culture of the Arctic by ethnic group:

Pages in Category:Fictional indigenous people of the Arctic: