Talk:Christian Ponder

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Image

edit

My point is that he is utterly unrecognizable, other than the uni. In this case, no image is better (IMO) simply because the image does not add to the article about him. It detracts by being a fuzzy picture of a football player who bears a general resemblance to at least three players (off the top of my head). Nolelover Talk·Contribs 15:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I admit that my objection is purely based on aesthetics, but I don't know of any policy that says we need to include an image when one's available. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 15:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
There's no policy that says we need to keep the image. However, the risk of Ponder being unrecognizable is of little problem. In fact, you could say the same thing about clearer pictures of people with their head turned or a helmet on. Mistaking him for Mark Sanchez, for example, is utterly impossible on the infobox of the Christian Ponder article, who wears a different number for a different team with a different color scheme. Admittedly, it needs to be replaced with a better free alternative, but it's not so distracting that it will throw editors off as to what or who the article is about Regards, — Moe ε 02:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
My crack about Sanchez was just meant to say that if you don't see the uniform, there's no way to tell that it's Ponder--the photo just isn't that good. In fact, we pretty much just have a picture of someone in the Viking's #7 uni. Regardless, thanks for the reply. Best, Nolelover Talk·Contribs 17:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, well, like I said, we need a better free alternative. I've been contacting users of Flickr about the copyright status of their images in hopes of convincing them to switch to a free license so I can upload them to the Commons. Flickr only contained this one image (which is a crop from a larger image I found.) Wilson, Luck, Tannehill, etc. need better or more current images. Regards, — Moe ε 01:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think I've gotten a better image uploaded and placed into the article now. Regards, — Moe ε 21:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Points for clarity, I guess. Thanks for finding that :) Nolelover Talk·Contribs 15:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Christian Ponder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply