Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life/Contest/Spooky Species Contest

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles

WikiFun Police

This article is within the scope of the WikiFun Police, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage and quality of fun articles on Wikipedia, including those tagged with {{humour}} and {{Humorantipolicy}}. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the Wikipedia talk:WikiFun Police discussion, see a list of open tasks, or submit a request for maintenance or coverage.WikiFun PoliceWikipedia:WikiFun PoliceTemplate:WikiProject FunWikiFun Police articles

Holidays: Halloween

	Holidays portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
	This page is supported by the Halloween task force.

Scoring structure

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey all, full steam ahead for the October event. How about something like what MILHIST does for their monthly contest? I removed the A class listings as those seem to be deprecated for TOL and its subpages. Basically people can self-assess article class for articles they improve up to B class. Maybe we should have some way of rewarding DYK noms and possibly a bonus point system for highly viewed articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enwebb (talk • contribs) 15:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Another thing that could be done is having a multiplier for collaboration? Maybe give 1.25x as many points if two (or more) people worked together to improve an article. There would have to be a difference between (for example) one person bringing an article to start class and someone else bringing it up to C vs two people working together to bring an article from stub to C. Collaboration would also speed up the process of improving these articles. The DYK aspect can be a multiplier as well. starsandwhales (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Points table
		Ending class
		Start /List	C/ CL	B/ BL	GA	FA/ FL
Beginning class	None/Stub	+1	+3	+6	+11	+26
	Start/List		+2	+5	+10	+25
	C/CL			+3	+8	+23
	B/BL				+5	+20
	GA					+15

Add topic