Wikipedia talk:Special:FewestRevisions

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Michaelwallace22 in topic Order

Its usefulness is limited because it includes redirects. :( 129.120.94.151 20:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

In fact, I think every "article" listed here seems to be a redirect.

And it's limited to only 1000 pages I think. ---Majestic- 15:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Someone really should submit a bug report; as is, this is a complete waste of resources. It also would be a complete waste of resources even if redirects were eliminated: almost all of the 1000 listed articles would probably be those created within the 24 hours prior to the report being run. (There are roughly 4000 articles created each day.) To be worthwhile, this report should be limited to articles that have been around for a bit - say, those created more than 60 days prior to the report date. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deleted Pages?

edit

FewestRevisions appears to consist of low-priority redirects and deleted pages. Why are deleted pages being counted? - Frankie (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The page data is cached from 2007 and some of the pages included in the report have probably been deleted by now. Nakon 01:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

7516820m

edit

<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here <gallery> Insert non-formatted text here </gallery> </nowiki>

2 revisions

edit

All of the things I've seen say 2 revisions, yet the first page on here (the only one I've checked: !! (disambiguation) has WAY more than 2. May be a little outdated.--Awesomewiki64 (talk) 14:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Checked a couple of others, this thing is broken--Awesomewiki64 (talk) 14:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Awesomewiki64, !! (disambiguation) does have two revisions. ([1]) I think you might have been confused because it is a redirect and the page it redirects to has more than two revisions but the redirect itself doesn't. TVShowFan122 (talk) 19:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Redirects

edit

The list contains almost (?) exclusively redirects. A redirect with one revision is standard, so the list isn't useful.Xx236 (talk) 14:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps redirects could be excluded from the list? Elassint Hi 02:36, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

This page is useless

edit

I agree with other comments here. This page serves no useful function. Most entries are disambiguation or redirects, which require few updates. Let's just drop it. Cossaxx (talk) 15:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disagreeing with other comments

edit

Since this page is mostly disambiguation pages, it helps to determine disambiguation changes that might need copy editing or transformation into set indices or surname pages, or may be likely to contain red links.

Order

edit

Is there any logic to the way these pages are ordered? It’s difficult to try to work through these pages when it’s unclear if there is a reasoning for their ordering. Michaelwallace22 (talk) 01:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply