Netherlands pages by quality | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | |||||||
Total | |||||||
![]() |
54 | ||||||
![]() |
14 | ||||||
![]() |
1 | ||||||
![]() |
171 | ||||||
B | 844 | ||||||
C | 2,994 | ||||||
Start | 11,985 | ||||||
Stub | 17,180 | ||||||
List | 879 | ||||||
Category | 14,594 | ||||||
Disambig | 56 | ||||||
File | 260 | ||||||
Portal | 9 | ||||||
Project | 27 | ||||||
Redirect | 742 | ||||||
Template | 1,139 | ||||||
NA | 4 | ||||||
Assessed | 50,953 | ||||||
Unassessed | 201 | ||||||
Total | 51,154 | ||||||
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 177,856 | Ω = 5.35 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Netherlands WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Netherlands related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Netherlands articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
edit- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Netherlands WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. It is however considered ethical conduct not to assess articles in the writing of which you yourself has been an important editor
- Can I rank an article as I like?
- No. Every editor can award stub, start, C, and B class. However, the higher quality labels require more. Good Article and Featured Article status can only be awarded to articles that have gone through the official Wikipedia nomination procedures. A-class assessment are reserved for very good articles, and should have received and fairly addressed extensive peer review (from within or outside the project).
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it; if it has indeed been improved; or the rating was unfair, a better quality will be assigned. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- I agreed with the low rating, but I have now improved the article, how can I get my rating up?
- Again, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
editQuality assessments
editAn article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Netherlands|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Netherlands articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Netherlands articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Netherlands articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Netherlands articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Netherlands articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Netherlands articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Netherlands articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Netherlands articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Netherlands articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale
editClass | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Requesting an assessment
editIf you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, you can request an assessment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Netherlands.
Assessment log
editNetherlands articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
June 28, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Europapa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Sanne de Jong (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- T-Brigade (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Wieke Bosch (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Ben Bakker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Bennie Tuinstra (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- File:De bilt photo.jpg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t)
- Haarlem-Zandvoort Spoorweg Maatschappij (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Mr. Review (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Crien Bolhuis-Schilstra (talk) removed.
June 27, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Steven van de Velde (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- The Alchemy Project (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Alidius Tjarda van Starkenborgh Stachouwer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Herman Brood & His Wild Romance (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Jet Bussemaker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Paulien Geerdink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Rutte cabinet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t)
- Sanne de Jong (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Ton van Baars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Wieke Bosch (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
June 26, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Marie du Saar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Vanessa Susanna (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Category:Cars of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Cees Laban (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Cineville (subscription service) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- David van Weel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Frans Moor (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Guytho Mijland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Hofje van Loo (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Iepenloftspul Jorwert (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Joop Wolff (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Kees van den Anker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Marijke Wuthrich-van der Vlist (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:ModernDutchAFVs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
- Wim Albers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Erik Meijaard (talk) removed.
- List of Dutch politicians (talk) removed.
June 25, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Marching and Cycling Band HHK (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Romy Speelman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Ron Meulenkamp (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Smogus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
June 24, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Chantal Schouwstra (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Renée Slegers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- 2025 in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
- Dirk Gotink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dutch poster artists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:East Limburgish dialects (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Melvin Twellaar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Sander Smit (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Category:Invasions of the Dutch Republic (talk) removed.
June 23, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Dalto (Driebergen) renamed to CKV Dalto.
- Fortuna (Delft) renamed to Fortuna Delft.
- H.K.C. ALO renamed to HKC ALO.
- KV TOP renamed to TOP Sassenheim.
Reassessed
edit- Geertruida Wijthoff (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Anouk van Brug (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Brigitte Sleeking (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- CKV Dalto (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dutch expatriate volleyball players in Russia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dutch swimmers by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Fortuna Delft (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Gerard Jacobs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- HKC ALO (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Ingeborg ter Laak (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Jimmy Vijgen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Laurens van Hoepen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Marie du Saar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Milan Smit (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Montdory (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Okke te Velde (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Rolf van der Vlugt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Susan Massotty (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- TOP Sassenheim (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Veerle Bakker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Henk Smitskamp (talk) removed.
- Sieb Warner (talk) removed.
- Category:Swimmers by city or town in the Netherlands (talk) removed.
- Tajikistan Support Project (talk) removed.
June 22, 2024
editRenamed
edit- TRIFIC-program renamed to MICAN-program.
Reassessed
edit- 2022–23 Almere City FC season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 SC Telstar season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Charlemagne (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
- Paul Quasten (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- 2022–23 ADO Den Haag season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 FC Eindhoven season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 Jong FC Utrecht season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 PEC Zwolle season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 RKC Waalwijk season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 SBV Vitesse season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 SC Cambuur season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 SC Heerenveen season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 Sparta Rotterdam season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 VVV-Venlo season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 Willem II season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Catarina Vieira (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Diet Wiegman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dutch explorers of North America (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dutch polar explorers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Geertruida Wijthoff (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Girasolar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Jeannette Baljeu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Johanna Maria Bätz (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- MICAN-program (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Mayors of Haarlemmermeer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Franeker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)