Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 31

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. No route map content, and no edits at all since creation in 2020. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. 2021 MLS Cup Playoffs already has the bracket as part of the article under the Bracket section. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with no direct links to the subject. No category exists for the topic. Links related to the subject's life in the first section are to article sections. No navigational benefit. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from the parent here. Gonnym (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from the parent here. Gonnym (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from parent here. Gonnym (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. The only substantive edit was in 2005. Appears to be abandoned with unclear potential use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is single-article content that already exists in the article at County Route 83 (Suffolk County, New York). – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Please let me know if you would like a copy of the content to add elsewhere. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NAVBOX says "external links should not be included in navigation templates". This one is 100% external links. Needs to be deleted. Nigej (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's really article content for International Soling Association. Also "Do not rely solely on navboxes for links to articles highly relevant to a particular article." and that seems to be the case here. Nigej (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you suggest that it is better that the content is be included in the article International Soling Association self?Dragon Genoa (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I'd say it was too detailed per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, but a section at that article on Soling Publications might work and could be a way forward. Nigej (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and contains parameters |caps= and |goals= from soccer that do not apply in archery. The only substantive edit was creation of this template in 2012, so it looks like an abandoned, half-built, single-article template. A reasonable summary version of this content exists at India at the 2012 Summer Olympics. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been orphaned during parent template updates, including conversion to Lua. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree : After checking, I actually created it here and another wiki (not wm) but apparently never bothered to use it here. Thanks for noticing it! Julio974 (Talk-Contribs) 21:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with no main article and no blue links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with no main article and no blue links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. There is no main article for this navbox, and the only blue link is to a person who no longer passes the new WP:NOLYMPICS criteria for notability. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is a blank squad navbox for a football team that does not appear to be playing anymore. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is long-standing consensus that only top level tournaments merit squad templates; this is not one of them. GiantSnowman 20:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Sweden left/Arlanda and other Sweden rail templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Orphaned after relevant pages were updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Sweden. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Regions of France uses a different map. Gonnym (talk) 19:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused Template:Find sources variant. Gonnym (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused date(?) template with the only thing in it "2019". Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football table. Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except within this set of templates. These are rail templates that have been replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Stockholm commuter rail. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Added an S-line template. Gonnym (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Tranz Scenic left/Northern Explorer and half a dozen other unused S-line templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These are {{S-line}} templates that have been migrated to {{Adjacent stations}} and are no longer needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the Northern Explorer ones specifically, I think deletion is premature as the service still exists and KiwiRail intends to restart it (unless the template has actually been migrated). pcuser42 (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pcuser42 is probably right. I wonder if it might be better to restore the Northern Explorer lines to articles like Paraparaumu railway station but modify the Northern Explorer templates to output "(suspended)" after the line name. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adding "suspended" would be a reasonable solution. In addition to this, I think the old Tranz Scenic branded templates could be deleted without issues (as that brand is long dead). pcuser42 (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
pcuser42 and Jonesey95 looks like Category:Tranz Scenic templates are duplicates of Category:KiwiRail Scenic templates. I have migrated both to Module:Adjacent stations/KiwiRail Scenic but we can obviously rename the module if that's not correct (or add a module redirect). Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox crowded out by {{Ancient Rome topics}}. Perhaps too disparate a group of articles, not clearly related to each other. Half taken up by Roman virtues which links to a section in Virtue. The rest is a collection of ideas and thinkers. Nigej (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox superseded by {{World Class Championship Wrestling}}. Nigej (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional unused s-line templates. Gonnym (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates relating to NCAA Division I FCS independent schools of which there is only one left. The content has been removed but they need deleting. No plausible use in the near future. Nigej (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Empty navboxes so nothing to use them for. Gonnym (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An editor has added 1 item to each, but the arguments for deletion remain the same. Nigej (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of these are useful for now. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused documentation template which was used on navboxes which were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 15:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps after the navboxes they were used on were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 15:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another navbox with a single link. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Utterly ridiculous. A navbox with a single link is in no imaginable way a navbox. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. plicit 14:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Really only one article about him. 2 films directed, 3 co-writer. - where he already appears in the infobox. Little or no use for navigation. Nigej (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the links, they are all valid per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Navigation and 5-6 links is also enough for a navbox. @RayneVanDunem when you add a navbox, place it on its own line. Gonnym (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused imagemap. Presumably used at one time in a navbox, rather like the one in {{Conservatism US footer}}. 9 random pictures doesn't help navigation. Nigej (talk) 14:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sagami color and other unused rail templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appear to have been orphaned after conversion from {{S-line}} to {{Adjacent stations}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unused subtemplate of Template:round, which is now redundant to {{formatnum:{{round|...|...}}|R}}. it was used by {{rndpad}} (also unused) and a couple other templates (like {{scinote}}) before being replaced. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now unused and replaced with other code. Gonnym (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 1 link, the parent article: Hungary at the FIFA World Cup. There used to be more but they were deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary at the 1966 FIFA World Cup and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary at the 1978 FIFA World Cup. Nigej (talk) 14:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicates of {{Canadian federal election, 2004/Churchill}}, {{Canadian federal election, 2000/Churchill}} and {{Canadian federal election, 1997/Churchill}}. Seems from Churchill—Keewatinook Aski that it was simply called "Churchill" until 2015. Nigej (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly created in error as it contains the 1962 result, not 1982. {{Canadian federal election, 1962/Winnipeg South Centre}} was created a short time later with the same content. Nigej (talk) 12:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Walt Disney World Monorail templates superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Walt Disney World Monorail. Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused METRORail templates superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/METRORail. Gonnym (talk) 12:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused New York City Subway templates superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/New York City Subway. Gonnym (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Novak Djokovic timelines. Gonnym (talk) 11:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from the template in September. Gonnym (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused message box template. Gonnym (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election template and no foreseeable usage either as Template:MMP by-election box candidate lose itself is using Template:Election box candidate with party link. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table template. Gonnym (talk) 11:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Basically a copy of {{Electorates of New Zealand}} which is used. Might be required after 2026, but surely too early to create now. Nigej (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. We have a current and historical. There is no other option. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We do have a bit of series here {{Electorates of New Zealand, 2014–2020}} and 2 others. However, surely when the electorates change in 2027, {{Electorates of New Zealand}} can be renamed and a new one started. Honestly I can't really see the point, as you say I suspect that all we need is current and historical. Nigej (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pointless series of templates. The European one had a similar series which was deleted recently. Gonnym (talk) 11:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the transclusions of the "used" templates in the set, it would seem that none of them are actually used at the electorate article and are instead used in other articles which aren't even linked to from these templates. A complete failure here. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of a mess here. 3 templates doing the same thing. {{Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress, Drama}} which is used and these two which aren't. Also templates in talk pages just to confuse it even more. Category:Black Reel Awards templates is a bit of a disaster area. Many duplicates, templates on talk pages. Nigej (talk) 09:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: note that Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress, Drama and Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress in a Drama Series are the same, while Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress, Drama Series is incorrectly titled as the link actually leads to Black Reel Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress, Drama Series for supporting and not guest. Gonnym (talk) 11:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
... which is a duplicate of Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress, Drama Series. So delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 11:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use article content that need substituting at Badminton at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification#Summary and then deleting. Nigej (talk) 09:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Badminton at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification#Qualification summary which has the information inline. Nigej (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused out-of-date table. 2022 FIVB Volleyball Women's World Championship qualification#Qualified teams has the up-to-date version. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blank unused league table. 2021–22 Premiership Rugby Cup doesn't use it and indeed seems to have a radically different format. Nigej (talk) 09:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blank unused league table. 2021–2023 ICC World Test Championship#League table is not using it. Nigej (talk) 08:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused incomplete league table. Final table exists at 2021 Football Queensland season#Football Queensland Premier League. Nigej (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural close. plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already coved in Template:Fluorides. Keres🌕Luna edits! 02:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).