Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 12

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsible template used a total of some 5 times. Izno (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used or needed after being merged with Module:Team bracket Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this template is necessary. The BLP notice above is enough. Interstellarity (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as pompous nonsense. It actually takes the editor's attention away from the important BLP notice. "In addition, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia, possibly without further warning." - can this be serious? Nigej (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a misrepresentation of policy. You can in fact be blocked for persistent addition of unreferenced content, but unless the unreferenced content is blatantly false and defamatory, it wouldn't qualify for an instant block. Vahurzpu (talk) 21:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and serves no plausible purpose —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 28. Primefac (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).