Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shepherds Flat Wind Farm

Shepherds Flat Wind Farm

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2013 at 13:28:07 (UTC)

Original – The Shepherds Flat Wind Farm is a 845 megawatt (MW) wind farm in the U.S. state of Oregon. Commissioned in 2012, it comprises 338 General Electric (GE) 2.5 MW wind turbines.

Reason: Appealing picture, making the reader want to know more
Articles in which this image appears: Shepherds Flat Wind Farm and 8 other articles
FP category for this image: Landscapes
Creator: Steve Wilson

Support as nominator --ELEKHH^T 13:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- You have got a good pic but the picture do not focus on the subject. The farm is only about 40% of the picture. Rest is of no use. You could have zoomed the picture. So oppose....'''Johncy''' (talk) 15:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I strongly disagree. The relationship between wind farms and the aesthetics of landscape is a broadly debated topic, notable in itself. Single turbines are rather standard industrial products, it is how each distinct farm sits in the landscape what makes the difference. That is precisely what this picture depicts. --ELEKHH^T 21:29, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree too. Colin°^Talk 19:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree with Johncy. I think wants to say to crop out the down portion to depict the subject clearer. And some parts of some turbines are missing. So Oppose Benison talk with me 13:48, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a nice enough picture but not special enough to be featured IMO for such a common thing. The clouds make the turbines harder to see in the thumbnail and the rightmost turbine is cropped. Resolution/sharpness are merely adequate. Colin°^Talk 19:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support-I support this for the reasons that ELEKHH has given. The contrast between the streamlined industrialisation of the wind farm and the eroded landscape is good. Also, I don't notice any parts of turbines missing. It's irrelevant to the subject of industrialisation in the rural landscape. This picture isn't simply about turbines. Amandajm (talk) 01:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin & John C Thomas. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]