Roberthooke003

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Roberthooke003, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Hunnic Invasion of the Roman Empire to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
• Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 22:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Its my pleasure,Welcome!!

How can I join The Teahouse and What benefits will I gain upon becoming a member of the Teahouse? Roberthooke003 (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, you do not really "join" the Teahouse. You can use it at any time to ask any questions you may have about editing Wikipedia, and our "hosts" will reply and try to help. GoldRomean (talk) 20:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

WP:RAJ

I see that in an edit summary at History of France you refer to WP:RAJ as a sourcing guideline. This isn't really a good idea. It is actually an essay, written by a contributor in regard to a specific issue we've been having over sources concerning the history of the Indian subcontinent. It isn't intended to cover sourcing more generally.

Having said that, you may well be making a valid point about the source. We probably shouldn't be citing Cicero for the specific statement being cited, as per Wikipedia:Reliable sources (the general guideline) articles need to be based around modern scholarship, rather than the primary source. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 03:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)