AfD nomination of STAY at Lincoln

edit
 

An editor has nominated STAY at Lincoln, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STAY at Lincoln and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

April 2008

edit
 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Belen Jesuit Preparatory School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 22:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Not to get into an arguement, but one of the bishops is in the process of being beautifified and the other bishop was the first bishop of Pinar del Rio. Many of Belen graduates do graduate from Ivy league schools, Xavier Suarez, former mayor of Miami, is a Harvard graduate. Perhaps if people would read the articles on the 19 persons from Belen that are in Wikipedia, you would understand that if Belen graduates decide to remain in Miami it is because this is where they decide to remain not because they can not go to Wall Street, they just don't want too. BTW very few of Belen graduates decide to go to FIU, most go away to continue their studies.Callelinea (talk) 23:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Belen Jesuit

edit

(You have kind of a spotty record here!  :) Improving though, right? I guess you forked all that stuff? Looks good IMO, pretty much. Left some notes on the discussion page. Thanks for the heads up. BTW, I am not an admin. (For goodness sakes, don't tell anybody!  :) Student7 (talk) 00:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Stayatlincoln2.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Stayatlincoln2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply