User talk:Puzzledvegetable/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Alternate Side Parking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Alternate Side Parking (talk) 00:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Question
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I have been editing Wikipedia and Wikiquote as the user Just A Regular New Yorker (talk · contribs). However, I have forgotten my old account password, and I do not have an email associated with that account, so I made this new account. Is this considered sockpuppetry? If so, what should I do instead?
Alternate Side Parking (talk) 01:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
- You should list your old account on your user page to help explain the history.
- You've been editing constructively since you were unblocked last time, so please keep it up. A user who is not blocked is generally allowed to create a new account and, as in your case, if the old account is abandoned and never used again, none of the problems of sockpuppetry or abuse of multiple accounts can arise. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Alternate Side Parking! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 16:46, Friday, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Your submission at Articles for creation: United Nations Panel on Climate Change (October 13)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United Nations Panel on Climate Change and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:United Nations Panel on Climate Change, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Alternate Side Parking!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Yanjipy (talk) 01:06, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Welcome! | |
|
Welcome to WikiProject History! We are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to history. Now that you're a member you might want to drop by one of our departments or join a task force. It is also recommended that you watchlist our talk page as well.
Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Libertas Americana has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
John from Idegon (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Alternate Side Parking! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Talkback
Message added 00:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
Canvassing
Thanks for the invite, but that's not a topic I know anything about, or feel that I can usefully contribute to.
There's also a policy WP:CANVASS which is quite strongly against this sort of bulk posting to drum up support. It's particularly in relation to discussions which approach being votes (and so depend on the number of supporters), but even for general editing, WP is against this approach.
You might do better engaging with the relevant projects, such as WP:WikiProject Judaism, and posting more general invitations or discussion topics, not aimed at specific editors. Good luck with it Andy Dingley (talk) 10:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley:I was simply asking for help from users that had posted to the talk page of WikiProject Judaism. I wasn’t aware this was a violation of policy. I have reviewed the policy page you showed me, and I believe my post was in full compliance. It is perfectly acceptable to ask multiple users to collaborate to improve an article. Alternate Side Parking (talk) 12:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC) + edit
This Month in GLAM: October 2018
| ||||||
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Puzzledvegetable! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Puzzledvegetable! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Wikiproject Congress
Welcome to Wikiproject U.S. Congress! —GoldRingChip 01:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Puzzledvegetable! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Puzzledvegetable! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
This Month in GLAM: November 2018
| ||||||
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Puzzledvegetable! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
|
I saw you were a fellow Spaceflight Projecteer, new editor, and Jew. Please accept this delicious Baklava, and thank you for your service! Neopeius (talk) 04:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM: December 2018
| ||||||
DS Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.