Mushy Yank

Archived talk: 1; 2; 3; 4.

A barnstar for you!

		The Civility Barnstar
		For single-handedly saving Grrr (2024 film)! DareshMohan (talk) 02:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, DareshMohan. I am not sure I deserve this one but I very gladly receive it.. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Notability

Can you check the notability of Oollo Pelliki Kukkala Hadavidi -- no reviews? DareshMohan (talk) 21:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello DareshMohan, no, apparently there's no review online but production was covered in the Deccan Chronicle and in the TOI twice, so I'd consider that with a notable cast that's been noted for its size, the film should meet GNG. Which, makes me think, that films like Image or Chappale, that you had mentioned lately might also be OK, after all (one having reviews but by the same journalist) and if challenged, redirected. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

It's fine. Those films are rather minor. Its best to stick with two reliable reviews. DareshMohan (talk) 08:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Can you check the sources of Abhinay, Kalloori Vinoth and Mahadevan (actor) and tell if better sources are needed. DareshMohan (talk) 03:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calabar Chic

Hey!

Just wanted to drop you a note about your !vote on the above AfD. I just wanted to make you aware of WP:LSC for future reference, these sort of lists normally require someone to have an article for inclusion on those pages, so a redirect in this case would likely be useless. I'm not trying to change the vote (hence not pinging you on there), but just wanted to make sure you were aware of the above! Cheers, Mdann52 (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello and thank you. Yes, I know that page. Still, I do think a redirect is acceptable and so is her inclusion in the list, given her notoriety. Not opposed to keep, if you prefer. Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

PS- I hadn't seen the page had been improved vastly and sources tend to show she's notable. So I'll change my vote to !Keep. Not sure you've seen those sources.

Specialized ink color

Could you please not use specialized coloring such as you did on AFD for Heer De Hero and 1905 (film). It makes the text glaring and hard to read for some editors. This might be cute and creative to you, but it hurts my eyes to even try to read it. I hate to think what it's like for people with serious vision issues. Please just stick to the normal black and no glaring highlighting. Thank you. — Maile (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello to you too. I'll use grey for quotations of sources then, which is not "glaring". (You'll note that the green used for tq is not my deed.)-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 07:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Is it allowed?

Is it allowed for an editor to edit only their own articles and gatekeep it [1] [2]? They should declare their COI on their page, they seem to be Jagadeesh Kanna themselves. DareshMohan (talk) 23:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello DareshMohan, I can't say if there's a COI, and you can ask them, but reverting your edit would have deserved AT LEAST an explanation. You did well to reinstate it. The List of Published works section is also a bit bizarre. But no, obviously no one owns any article, although, yes, if someone wants to edit only 2 articles, even about them, I would say they can. It's just that writing about yourself is not recommended; but not prohibited (so yes, it's allowed, although, as you say, disclosure is preferable and it often leads to edit wars (the person wants a better picture or no picture, details about something but no mention of something else, etc)). It might not be the case, though. Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

They may be notable for their work in the Indian astronomy industry but the listing of an unsourced film called Thiraikadal seems unwarranted: Jagadeesh_Kanna#Filmography. I'm not sure about the role of an artist is. I had removed it, but they readded it, must be a dual role. The career section seems to already mention his film Naalu Peruku Nalladhuna Edhuvum Thappilla. The table seems unwarranted since he only acted in one feature film. I would split the filmography table into films and music album, but they might revert my edit. I have never seen the - dash symbol randomly placed in the filmography table. DareshMohan (talk) 06:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm confused about this policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline

It feels like editing too frequently can be a problem.

I found several articles with 3 reliable reviews and I create say three articles back to back. Is that against View one: Don't rush to create articles.

I made a mistake and I feel like reverting it the second I remember it. View seven: Submission hesitancy. Someone else can revert your error. DareshMohan (talk) 07:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello DareshMohan, don't forget this is just an essay. But no I don't think your first example goes against its view#1. And as for the second example, I would rather take view#7 as another way to say "Hey, if you're not that sure, there's no need to worry, you can try or not try, but if you try and if it turns out to be wrong, someone may revert you." My personal opinion is that you're an experienced and scrupulous contributor and you can afford to be bold without worrying too much. But yes, I agree, because this essay goes in various directions (warning, encouraging?), I think it's slightly confusing. Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)