July 2010

edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page 1930 FIFA World Cup worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. I would recommend you read the article first. TbhotchTalk C. 05:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your edits seems an hoax because YOU ARE TAGGING THE LEAD ENTERILY. If you need a source wait until tomorrow because ,c'mon you waited until the day that this is in the main page, also if you need a source GET IT and ADD IT, do not deface the article asking sources. TbhotchTalk C. 06:00, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, you know alot about editing Wikipedia. TbhotchTalk C. 06:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

1930 FIFA World Cup

edit

I "tagged the lead entirely" because none of the "lead" is sourced. Also, your poor grammar and spelling makes it difficult to understand what you are attempting to say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Machofantastic (talkcontribs) 06:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me but if you look at my userpage, at bottom, it says en-lv2 not native. Also, you are vandalizing the article and I can demosttrate it:

"The first two World Cup matches took place simultaneously, and were won by France and the United States, who defeated Mexico 4–1 and Belgium 3–0, respectively.[citation needed] Lucien Laurent of France scored the first goal in World Cup history.[citation needed]Argentina, Uruguay, the US and Yugoslavia each won their respective groups to qualify for the semi-finals.[citation needed] In the final, hosts and pre-tournament favourites Uruguay defeated Argentina 4–2 in front of a crowd of 93,000 people, and became the first nation to win a World Cup.[citation needed]"

If you really read the article, ALL of this shit is in the "Result" section, so stop messing with it. oh also this is for you

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TbhotchTalk C. 06:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

It's clear to me as well that you've been here before. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply