MACMAN1
Welcome!
Hello, MACMAN1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
--Biblbroks's talk 14:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Your unsourced addition to Ocean's Three and a Half
editPlease do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did here [1]. Please undo this edit. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 08:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
My edits do NOT violate the rules of Wikipedia and are not "original research." Facts are facts! You can dispute an opinion, but not a fact. Check the disussion section of the Hulu page of this episode. http://www.hulu.com/watch/57947/family-guy-oceans-three-and-a-half. MACMAN1 (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- You are drawing an inference from the episode itself and making your own evaluations from it, and that is a violation of the WP:NOR policy. Please do not do it again. Thanks. Cirt (talk) 13:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am NOT making an inference, defined as; "the act of passing from one proposition, statement, or judgment considered as true to another whose truth is believed to follow from that of the former." Nor am I making an evaluation, defined as; "determining the significance, worth, or condition of usually by careful appraisal and study." What I did was include factual and verifiable information about this episode as it was broadcast. MACMAN1 (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- No need for you to use CAPS, that only throws yelling into an otherwise constructive dialogue. I think you misunderstand - has this supposed change in broadcast been reported anywhere? A book? Newspaper report? Review of the episode? These are all secondary sources, whereas the episode's broadcast on some TV network would be a primary source and a violation of WP:NOR. Cirt (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Also no need for you to continually cross-post the same message at my talk page and here. Let's keep one unified thread here please. Thanks. Cirt (talk) 15:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am NOT making an inference, defined as; "the act of passing from one proposition, statement, or judgment considered as true to another whose truth is believed to follow from that of the former." Nor am I making an evaluation, defined as; "determining the significance, worth, or condition of usually by careful appraisal and study." What I did was include factual and verifiable information about this episode as it was broadcast. MACMAN1 (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)