Welcome

edit

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, John Mackenzie Burke, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Paul (talk) 13:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nice work on the Genetics topics. It is good to have an expert around here, keep up the good work. AIRcorn (talk) 12:57, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply


Invitation for a short research survey

edit

Hi, I am a PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University doing some research into editing and reverts on Wikipedia. I am looking for editors who have done some editing to Genetics articles on Wikipedia as participants in a short survey. The survey will take about 10-15 minutes, and will help me model what sorts of things are reverted on Wikipedia so that I can develop interfaces and tools for newcomers and administrators. If you would like to participate, please complete the survey on SurveyMonkey here. You can find out more about me on my user page and personal home page. I'm more than happy to talk more about this research on my talk page, and thank you for your time. JeffRz (talk) 19:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

your summary article

edit

What is the exact nature of your article that the separate articles on RNA, DNA and proteins do not cover? Is there a way to merge this information into an existing article? (Perhaps on the central dogma of molecular biology article itself?) I did not delete it because it seemed like a useful essay, but essays do not fit our encyclopedic format. I hope you will find a way to fix it. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (be free) 18:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Antibiotic Resistance

edit

I've just noticed that you changed the lead sentence in the antibiotic resistance article to specify that it results from a genetic change. I thought antibiotic resistance has been around pretty much as long as we know, i.e. some bacteria are inherently resistant to certain antibiotics. Not sure if the new wording implies that the change is a recent one, which would be a bit misleading. What are your thoughts? Zchahe7 (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Very good point. My intention was to convey that this genetic change could be either contemporaneous or ancient. I just rewrote the whole introductory paragraph, and hopefully this is clearer. Please feel free to make further improvements.

FYI, now that Google and Bing display the opening text of Wikipedia articles in their search results, I am trying to make the first sentence as straightforward, informative, and interesting as possible. Sometimes that means dissecting out qualifying phrases and moving them to the second or third sentence of the opening paragraph.

Thanks again for your suggestion, and all of your contributions. John Mackenzie Burke (talk) 15:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I agree that the first sentence needs to be as clear as possible. I think MonkeyJunky's recent edit made it more clear, as I don't think the word "contemporaneous" is in common parlance. Otherwise I like the way you rewrote it.

Zchahe7 (talk) 14:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Messenger RNA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transcription (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adenosine triphosphate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fermentation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Replication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sanger sequencing

edit

I've added one of the figures (shown below) I've been creating as part of my overhaul of the Genomics article to the lead section of Sanger sequencing as an overview image. This is a significant change, and as the most recent major editor of the article I welcome any feedback as to its content or appropriateness. Best regards, James Estevez (talk) 20:24, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
Sanger-sequencing

I like it! Very nice, accurate and clear overview. Hope you are able to continue to contribute high quality graphics. --John Mackenzie Burke (talk) 21:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regulatory sequence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Activators (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Human genome table 1

edit

I love the table you added to the Human Genome article in September 2012, but I've been hunting around on the Ensembl website, and I can't find the sources for all your data. Some of it is on the chromosome summary pages (with slightly different numbers by now), but I can't find for each chromosome the total of protein-coding genes, rRNA genes, etc. I'd like to be able to confirm those numbers before I cite them in class. Can you help me? If so, I can also add links or clarification to the table legend to point other people to the sources. Thanks. Jbening (talk) 21:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The table with the number of genes in each category was in version 68 of the database that was current at the time I added the table, but the two releases since then (for some unknown reason) lack those summaries. Ensembl 68 is still available in the archives: http://www.ensembl.org/info/website/archives/index.html For example, here is a live link to chromosome 15, with the data you are looking for: http://jul2012.archive.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Location/Chromosome?r=15 Hope this helps. --John Mackenzie Burke (talk) 22:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Belated thanks! I just edited the reference to give a direct link to version 68. Jbening (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Enjoying listening to Vermont Public Radio interview

edit

Hello - I'm enjoying the interview you participated in on VPR. KConWiki (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

A cup of coffee for you!

edit
  Thank you for keeping Wikipedia clean as you did at personal genomics. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, John Mackenzie Burke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, John Mackenzie Burke. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply