Jezhotwells

This user may have left Wikipedia. Jezhotwells has not edited Wikipedia since 17 February 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives

1 Dec 2008—Nov 2009
2 Nov 2009—Feb 2010
3 Feb 2010—Apr 2010
4 Apr 2010—Jul 2010
5 Jul 2010—Dec 2010
6 Dec 2010—Apr 2011
7 Apr 2011—Aug 2011
8 Aug 2011—Nov 2011
9 Nov 2011—Mar 2012
10 Mar 2012—Feb 2013
11 Feb 2013—

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

You've got mail: Colross

Hello, Jezhotwells. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Good Article reassessment

The Soxaholix, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Good article reassessment for Multiple sequence alignment

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Multiple sequence alignment has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Compliance requirements

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Compliance requirements has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 10:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for John W. Campbell

Latest comment: 4 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

John W. Campbell has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic