Yo

edit

Can yuo please create a RSWiki forum topic saying that I will not be editing for a while? My internet is messed up and cannot access RS or the wiki. PLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?????????? Cashman286talk 23:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hullo! looks like your talk page is pretty blank... btw, u spk 1337? coolio! Codenametiger

Yup, I speak 1337. 1337 |5 l||<3 7074||'/ 4vv35()m3!!! ÇɧĭДfrĪĔпd12 18:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well this sucks...

edit

This is Chia. There seems to be problems with Wikipedia accepting my password and sending a new one to my e-mail, which I DID enter into my preferences. So this may be the end to my account! :( --67.171.218.238 21:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind, I remembered it. {{ÇɧĭДfrĪĔпd12}} 23:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Just poppin' in to say Hello. Btw, I am Emosworld (as you know me on the rswiki, rs fanon wiki, halopedia and dark runescape wiki). Weirdy Talk 05:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lol :)


Weirdy Talk 20:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smile Day

edit

Weirdy Talk 04:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

W00T THx! Weirdy Talk 19:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Donald Hoobler

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Donald Hoobler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BowChickaNeowNeow (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Smosh

edit

They can change their birthday on myspace, so it would change their age...but i didn't notice that their myspace page was linked from their youtube page...good enough reference for me, I'll fix it! Ctjf83Talk 03:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Charles Grant (soldier)

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charles Grant (soldier), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Livna-Maor (talk) 21:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Smosh

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Smosh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hahaha

edit

Nice job on the redirect there. 64.252.207.229 (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Who's that IP, Hi Chia, it's me! EditzTalk 23:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC) Reply

Quixotic plea

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 04:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

hi

edit

hi chia bae ~ty(talk) 05:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Impersonation attempt

edit

I have reverted the edits (something you can easily do yourself if this happens again) and I have blocked the other account indefinitely for such a blatant violation of the username policy (And this is the very first time in years of enforcing that policy that I have come across an account so blatantly created and used for that purpose). Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Trouted

edit
 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: not funposting at reddit <3

Nomination of Warren Muck for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warren Muck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Muck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 22:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Donald Hoobler for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Hoobler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Hoobler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

〷 listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect . Since you had some involvement with the redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply