Buck12341

February 2019

Your recent editing history at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Leviv ich 06:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

AOC partisans are reverting accurate edits. It's silly. It's widely known that wiki editors are left wing, but this is ridiculous.Buck12341 (talk) 06:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Buck12341

From earlier: DS notice, final warning one for "edit warring, uncollaborative editing and uncollegial commentary, and use of unreliable sources to further a POV", final warning two. From today at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (1RR): add, revert, revert; call editors "fanboys", "beta boy", threaten bans at article talk page, article talk page again, and user talk page. Final warning three is the one above. Pinging Drmies. Leviv ich 06:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Well they're certainly acting like it. I'm just adding highly relevant info to a wiki. I'm looking into having you banned for harassment.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

• Buck, I think you're lucky Martin was in a good mood and overlooked this. Drmies (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you may be blocked from editing. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Buck12341 reported by User:Levivich (Result: ). Thank you. Leviv ich 22:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User:Tsumikiria. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)