Welcome!

Hello, Brettstout, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! doncram (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Ann-Royer.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ann-Royer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:U-of-iowa.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:U-of-iowa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

linking to Sioux City Orpheum

edit

Hi, I noticed your edit to List of RHPs in IA which added a link to the Sioux City Orpheum article. I think you didn't understand that the Woodbury County section of the state-wide NRHP list-article is actually in a separate list-article that is mentioned there, at National Register of Historic Places listings in Woodbury County, Iowa, so it wasn't actually necessary to create a new table for it in the state-wide list. But the separate Woodbury County list-article didn't link properly to the Sioux City Orpheum article, either, so because you pointed it out, I edited the Woodbury County list just now. Thanks for making the connection! I also just added to the Orpheum article itself. I hope you might be interested in adding pictures or otherwise developing the Woodbury County NRHP list-article or any other NRHP stuff. If you are interested in NRHP sites or have any questions, please let me know and/or please feel free to post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Cheers, doncram (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey, dude, I think you misunderstand how the state-wide NRHP list-article is supposed to be working.  :) Perhaps it could be labelled better or explained better, but it provides, within it, list-tables for each of the smaller counties. For Woodbury counties and other bigger counties, it provides wikilinks over to their separate list-articles. It is not appropriate to copy Woodbury's table into the state-wide list article. The state-wide list-article is already at a pretty big filesize and cannot hold all the bigger counties' tables. I'll open a discussion section about this at Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Iowa. It would be most helpful if you could please discuss there before making further changes along these lines within the list-article. I do concede in advance that maybe some better labelling/explanation within the list-article would perhaps improve the situation. Thanks! doncram (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Czech slovak museum flood.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Czech slovak museum flood.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:OrpheumWlogo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:OrpheumWlogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

NRHP infoboxes

edit

Hi Brettstout -- As you've probably noticed i have been noticing your new articles on theatres and have been revising them somewhat. For one thing, I notice you have been creating NRHP infoboxes apparently manually, using information from nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com and crediting that source. You may or may not be aware that is a private, for-profit website that serves up National Register data that is in the public domain.

A better and easier alternative, in my view, is to use the NRHP infobox generator that was created by User:Elkman to serve wp:NRHP wikipedia editors. Elkman downloaded the same NRHP database but has further corrected various errors not fixed by the NRHP.COM version. Also, the infobox generator provides a cut-and-paste ready infobox with most fields filled out with official NRIS data. All you do is visit http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/infobox.php, plug in, say "Polk" and "FL", and it will generate output which you can cut and paste over into an article. The infobox comes in with a reference footnote crediting NRIS and date in April, 2008. That is the date of the NRIS database extract that was publicly provided and that is the source for both NRHP.COM and Elkman. The date should not usually be changed, unless in fact you get new data from NRIS directly. The NRHP infobox thus created gives a good start. You can add other information to it from other sources, in which cases you should probably credit each other addition by footnote to your other sources. The NRIS coordinates data is often slightly off, due mostly to changes of the U.S. coordinates system since much of the NRIS coordinates were gathered off of old U.S. Geological Survey quadrant maps, not exactly compatible with current coordinate system used by Google maps etc. Hope this may be of some assistance to you. Cheers, doncram (talk) 16:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Ann Beach

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ann Beach, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Beach. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Esasus (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading File:RMofEd.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:BamaAL.jpg

edit

File:BamaAL.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Bama Theatre-City Hall Building.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Bama Theatre-City Hall Building.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Englert2007winter.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Englert2007winter.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RMofEd.gif)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:RMofEd.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

August 2009

edit

  Your recent addition to File:Englert2007winter.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 00:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for File:Di-no fair use rationale

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Di-no fair use rationale. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Theatre Newsletter - February 2010

edit
The WikiProject Theatre Newsletter (Febrauary 2010)
 
The WikiProject Theatre Newsletter!
Issue 5 - February 2010

Welcome to the latest WikiProject Theatre newsletter (the first in quite a while!) bringing you news of what's going on in the project, what progress we're making, and how you can get involved.

Latest News
  • All theatre articles currently tagged with a project banner have now been assessed for quality. There are still plenty to assess for importance, though - see the article assessment page for details.
  • There is now a News section on the main project page, updated automatically to keep us informed of developments in theatre articles.
Collaboration of the Month
  • Theatre has been nominated as the next project collaboration. This could be an excellent opportunity to improve the quality of one of our most important articles - listed as one of Wikipedia's top 1000 most vital articles - but it needs a lot of work before it can be considered for even good article nomination!
  • Stop by the collaboration page for tips on how to improve an article, to add your support, or to suggest alternative or future collaborations.
Jobs you can do

Any and all improvements to theatre-related articles will help the project, but if you're looking for something to do, have a look at the to-do list. Some current areas of priority are:

If you are currently working on a particular topic or area of the project, and would like to muster some support from other editors, feel free to add tasks to the to-do list. Or even think about setting up an informal working group - create a project subpage to organise tasks in a central location. Remember you can always discuss ideas with others at the project talk page.

New members

If you've been editing a theatre-related article recently and noticed another user helping you who also appears to have an interest for the subject of theatre, why not drop them a line and invite them over to the project?

And finally...

You have received this newsletter because your name is on the list of Members on the WikiProject page. If this information is out of date and you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the list, or click here to stop receiving it.
If you have any news or announcements to be broadcast, do let us know on the talk page.

Not Myself Tonight

edit

Though the info you keep adding may be true, but it is WP:OR and not stated by any article or sources. Thanks. Candyo32 (talk) 22:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Project Iowa news

edit

Hi, you are receiving this notice because you are a member of WikiProject Iowa. I hope you will take the time to check out the developing division called Communities (pre-named and previously red-linked). Keep up the good work.
Please click on the links in the GOOD NEWS notice. RifeIdeas Talk 23:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

edit
 

Hello, Brettstout! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Rainbow-banner.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Rainbow-banner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

edit
  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:PasDe-Deux.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 09:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:OrpheumWlogo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:OrpheumWlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Wichita Orpheum.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Wichita Orpheum.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc () 20:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply