Welcome! Hello, Andywarhol1229, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! BOVINEBOY2008 :) 22:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


File permission problem with File:Chloe sevigny demonlover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Chloe sevigny demonlover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 22:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chloë Sevigny

edit

Per these sockpuppet results, I have archived the FAC, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chloë Sevigny/archive1, nominated by Ashton 29 (talk · contribs), and supported by her sock Chaelee (talk · contribs). To my recollection, this is an unprecedented situation at FAC, and running multiple accounts to influence the featured article process is a serious matter. When we get some things cleared up, you may be allowed to renominate the article at FAC. I will follow your talk page for any questions you may have or comments you want to make here. Ashton29 is blocked for one week, and her sock Chaelee is blocked indefinitely. While she is blocked, Ashton29 is still able to respond to queries on her own talk page, in case you have any questions for her. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 06:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • What exactly is "sockpuppeting"; are you saying that the user had multiple accounts and was using them to garner FA status for the article? Anyhow, I'm continuing to work on the article and am following the recommendations on the history page. Sorry if I don't understand everything on here, there are still many facets of Wikipedia that I am NOT educated on. Thank you! (PS: When I want to nominate the article for GA status, how do I do that?)
"Sockpuppeting" means that one person uses multiple Wikipedia accounts. We have strong evidence that Ashton 29, who nominated the article, and Chaelee, who supported it, are in fact the same person. That is prohibited on Wikipedia, because it makes it look like there is more support for a position than there actually is. Ucucha 22:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm back :)

There are multiple issues here you should be aware of.

First, do you know how to step back through the history of the article, and review the edits I made and the comments I left? There is much work to be done before this article is FAC-ready.

Second, I don't participate at WP:GAN, and don't follow their processes, but you should find instructions there.

Third, you should carefully read the instructions at the WP:FAC page to understand why we need to know who is the main contributor to the article. Since that is you, your "Support" doesn't count, and since Ashton and Chaelee were the same person, and the nominator, their "Support" didn't count either. We need independent support to promote an article, and knowing that you are doing the work means you should eventually nominate, your support won't "count" (is implied), and if Ashton comes back, she is an "involved" editor, so her support is discounted.

Fourth, it's also important that you edit logged in because FAC reviewers, who followed the sockpuppetry case, will be suspicious now of any new accounts showing up to edit the article. They will be reassured knowing that you weren't involved, and that you are the primary contributor. If I can answer any other questions, please ask! But please be sure to go back through my edits to notice the kinds of things I mentioned. If you don't know how to do that, just ask here, as I'm sure some of my TPS (Talk Page Stalkers, people who follow my edits) will pitch in. Good luck! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chloë Sevigny

edit

Are you still interested in getting this article into FA shape? Ashton 29 (talk) 06:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chloë Sevigny GAN

edit

Hey, just to let you know, I've reviewed Chloë Sevigny for GA and passed it, but there are some pointers for you towards FAC at Talk:Chloë Sevigny/GA2. I suggest you put it up for peer review for some more feedback once those are fixed and before another FAC. You're welcome to get in touch if you need a hand. HJ Mitchell | April Fool! 23:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Chloe Sevigny Boys Dont cry.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Chloe Sevigny Boys Dont cry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Courtney Love. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 00:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Youshotandywarhol, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it could considered offensive by other editors. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Hole CD insert Von Unwerth.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Hole CD insert Von Unwerth.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Solid State Survivor (talk) 10:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Youshotandywarhol, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Poster-the-beyond 0.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Poster-the-beyond 0.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Chloë Sevigny Boys Dont Cry.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Chloë Sevigny Boys Dont Cry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Andywarhol1229 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Yunshui  08:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Murder of Whitney Heichel for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Whitney Heichel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Whitney Heichel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 20:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The devils redgrave reed.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:The devils redgrave reed.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 05:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:What ever happened to aunt alice.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:What ever happened to aunt alice.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply