Peer review

edit

Hello Amanda, and welcome! I'm glad you found the peer review of use, I'm more than happy to re-review the article, it may take me a day or so to get the time to do, but I will get back to you in due course. If there's anything more I can help you with, please don't hesitate to drop me another note on my talkpage. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 10:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Amanda, hi. It's much much better than it was, I've left a few more hints at the peer review. Let me know if I can help further (although I see your colleagues have nominated ten more forensic entomology articles for PR so I guess I'll be busy!) Can I recommend you alert your colleagues to this and the other PRs which have been conducted recently in order to iron out the easy things, mainly manual of style issues like section heading names, image sizes and captions etc. That would make the reviewers lives a little easier! All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 07:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey, the whole {{cite web}} template seems to be a mystery to seasoned Wikipedians so not to worry, check out this change I made to your article. It should give you an idea as to how the template works. If you need more help then shout at me, but do consider the fact that I'm probably +6 hrs from you so will be in bed soon! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Amanda I put another note on your articles talk page. I hope to read the whole text more carefully at the weekend.Best wishes Robert Notafly (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

Hi Amanda, the title Forensic Entomological Decomposition is more confusing - it looks like a new kind of decomposition. Would suggest "Decomposition (forensic entomology)" (note case also) - which will follow WP:MOS and suggest that it is a sub article of Decomposition. Shyamal (talk) 07:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Arpad Vass

edit

You have made contributions to the article Forensic Entomological Decomposition Would you care to add information to the requested biography of Arpad Vass which is now started, and has been a request since 2006. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 00:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply