207.35.68.4

February 2016

Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Harrison Trimble High School has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to National Lampoon's Gold Diggers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Sucralose— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 21:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hard problem of consciousness. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Intelligent design. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 15:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The idea of pseudoscience should not be included in this article

The article starts with an opinion that Intelligent design is pseudoscience. Then it juxtaposes it against other opinions making them seem to be science and Intelligent design is not. However until there is a real cosmological theory one way, or the other then it is all just opinion. The universe began from nothing and space and time began at the same time. There was nothing else. I write and publish on cosmology regularly and used to work with the late Stephen Hawking. Everything in this regard is just opinion. There is no proof of anything else and starting out an article by insulting the people who have tried to offer an opinion is not what should be seen in this venue. The article mocks what the real science behind the whole debate is.

May 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Richard Dawkins are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at High five, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cotton-Eyed Joe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cotton-Eyed Joe was changed by 207.35.68.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929546 on 2020-01-04T02:29:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of people from Peterborough, Ontario have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 00:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

---