The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Porak

edit
  • ... that petroglyphs dated 5000BP show eruption activity from Porak volcano?
  • Reviewed: Kerry v. Din
  • Comment: Expanded the volcano article just today. Hopefully the new text isn't too close to the source, though.

Created/expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 10:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC).

  • Article is new and long enough. Posted by due date. Hook refrences AGF. No copy vio noted. Good to go.--Nvvchar. 14:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
  • The article practically copies the wording and sentence-after-sentence structure of the online source given at the very bottom of the page (not sure why it's placed there). This must be rewritten in your own words.
  • Source: The volcanic field straddles the Armenia/Azerbaijan border, and lava flows extend into both countries. The flanks are dotted with 10 satellitic cones and fissure vents.
  • Article: The volcanic field straddles the border, and lava flows extend into both countries. The flanks of the volcano are dotted with 10 satellite cones and fissure vents.
  • Yoninah (talk) 21:30, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Aye, that is wrong. Apparently it was so before I expanded the article. <Facepalm>. I'll remedy it immediately. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you, that's better. No close paraphrasing seen. Restoring tick per Nvvchar's review. Yoninah (talk) 22:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)