Template:Did you know nominations/Phoenix, Arizona

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Phoenix, Arizona

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Onel5969 (talk). Nominated by SSTflyer (talk) at 09:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC).

  • Where is the ALT1 hook fact with an inline cite in the article? Yoninah (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • @Onel5969: where? This is a GA, and should not contain unsourced statements. SSTflyer 13:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Anyway, I will provide another April Fool's hook:
  • ALT2: ... that a bird more than quadrupled in size between 1950 and 1960? SSTflyer 13:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Nominated for DYK on same day as received GA icon. New enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. Since we did catch that non-referenced statement (ALT1) in the lead, and since Wikipedia is timeless, please provide both a citation and a specific time frame of years or decades for this statement. ALT2 is suitably hooky for April Fools Day; offline hook ref AGF and cited inline. QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Solved by removing the paragraph from the lead section. SSTflyer 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, someone else added it back with a cite. ALT2 is good to go for April Fools Day. One minute. The second statement is cited, the 4% figure is not. Yoninah (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Done SSTflyer 16:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • @SSTflyer: I understand what you're doing, but User:Rjensen doesn't. Perhaps you could work it out with him before this goes live on April 1. Yoninah (talk) 17:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I think my edit summary is clear enough. SSTflyer 17:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I'll give this a few more hours to see if there's going to be any edit warring. Yoninah (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • So far so good. ALT2 good to go for April Fools Day. Yoninah (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I would much prefer ALT1 though if it could be verified. Gatoclass (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
  • @Gatoclass: I found the ref and added it to the article. However, the 40-year period ended in the mid-2000s. The correct wording would be:
  • ALT3: ... that a bird grew nearly 4% per year over a span of four decades? Yoninah (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT3 verified to source provided, and meets criteria based on length, neutrality, and interestingness. SSTflyer 14:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)