Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Boggs

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 21:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Mary Boggs

edit

Created by SusunW (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 18:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC).

  • YesY New enough (created 5 March, nominated 6 March), long enough (2312 characters), and article is within policy.
  • YesY Hook is short enough, interesting, and supported by [2] (source checked as I have Newspapers.com access).
  • QPQ not done. According to WP:QPQ, "For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination (unrelated to you)—​​this is called quid pro quo or QPQ. The review must address all five criteria listed here." This obliges Gerda Arendt to do a QPQ as the nominator.
  • Once QPQ is done, I'll be happy to promote. Apparently I literally can't read. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • And I'd like this to be run on 8 March if at all possible. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
I guess that Joseph thinks that it wasn't a complete review, but it was. I don't have to say "long enough", only when it's not long enough, etc. Joseph, you can check out my other reviews, more than 45 this year- - I am a picky reviewer but don't like to waste time with stating the obvious. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Not sure how but I genuinely missed the QPQ on there. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Good to go. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)