Template:Did you know nominations/Kate Frank

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 23:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Kate Frank

edit

Created by SusunW (talk). Self-nominated at 23:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, within policy. Hook #1 is more interesting than #2, but is right at the edge of the 200 character limit, which I understand is a Bad Thing. If you can shorten it just a bit, would be better. How about "... that Kate Frank started a National Education Association teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from her successful case to be rehired?" That's 150-odd, and IMHO, conveys the same information. Three cheers for the Women in Red! --GRuban (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the review GRuban the only problem with the ALT is that she didn't start it, NEA did. I am also concerned someone might kick it because I could never find an article about the outcome of the case. We know she was rehired, but whether it ever went to court or was settled, I couldn't verify. What about (184 char):
ALT3 ... that the National Education Association started a teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from collections for Kate Frank′s case to be rehired by Muskogee schools? SusunW (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Works for me. --GRuban (talk) 21:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)