Template:Did you know nominations/Big-fish-little-pond effect

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Big-fish-little-pond effect

edit

5x expanded by AttackMoose22 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

  • Approving this nomination which was not properly transcluded in April. The article is a fivefold expansion and is long enough. The hook facts are sourced, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but I find the hook wording clunky. It would be far hookier to write it, perhaps using piped links, as ...that it is better to be a little fish in a big pond than a big fish in a big pond? Yoninah (talk) 16:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: it appears the nominator has not worked on Wikipedia since May. Do you want to upgrade the hook? Yoninah (talk) 16:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Actually, the papers are talking about self-concept, so I tweaked the hook. Restoring tick per your review. Yoninah (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)