Talk:Vatican leaks scandal

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Debresser in topic Continuity

Vatican internal investigation

edit

Since this invesigation has presumably been concluded, now that Gabriele has been convicted, this section really should be reworded from the present tense to the past tense. Dick Kimball (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


Bad puns

edit

Where does the phrase 'the butler did it' come from? 93.97.45.17 (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/13993.html. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Resignation

edit

And today, Pope Benedict resigns. First time a Pope has done this since 1294. One wonders if there is a connection to the Vatileaks scandal. W. B. Wilson (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The last pope to resign was in 1415. :p--Ollyoxenfree (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Page name

edit

Hey everyone, I was wondering what the general opinion would be on a change of this page name. While "Vatileaks" was certainly used, it seems from looking through coverage that it was probably not the definitive most common name, and that a name like "Vatican leaks scandal" was more commonly used and would be more descriptive and less informal. Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Vatican leaks scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vatileaks 2?

edit

There is a second Vatican leaks scandal 1. Should it be included in this article or should it have its own article? Thinker78 (talk) 01:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Person's name not clear

edit

In the below sentence, it is not clear who Allen is.

According to Allen, none of the information leaked seemed "especially fatal".

Refer to the source at the end of the line (no. 4). Editrite! (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Continuity

edit

The second paragraph of the lead starts with "Over following months", however, the first paragraph of the lead does ot include any time indicator, making these words meaningless. This should be fixed. Debresser (talk) 23:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply