Talk:The Amazing Digital Circus/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 01:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Skyshifter The review is done, hope these can be addressed! Good luck to you and your fellow editors. :) Arconning (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 12:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

• I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Good luck to the editors! Can't believe this article is up for GAN so I decided to take it up, lol. Arconning (talk · contribs)

Prose and MoS

Lead

• to the whims of a rogue artificial intelligence., change whims to a more formal word.
  • I don't see how "whims" is too informal. What word would you suggest instead?--Eldomtom2 (talk) 15:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

    Did "instructions", like the Synopsis section. Skyshiftertalk 18:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• Gooseworx pitched the series to Glitch inspired, add comma after Glitch.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• The pilot became viral and one..., rewrite to The pilot went viral and became one....

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• most viewed, add hyphen.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• and was nominated for an Annie Award., add it before was.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Synopsis

• No issues. Pass.

Voice cast

• Would like to know if there's any source that supports the claims.. :)

  Added sources related to the characters. These sources don't confirm the voice actors; however, the actors are credited at the end of each episode. I think that, following the logic of MOS:PLOTSOURCE, it can be presumed that the episode's credits reference that information. If needed though, I can add the episodes as additional, primary references. PLOTSOURCE should also apply to some "Guests" to whom I couldn't find secondary sources. Skyshiftertalk 18:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Episodes

• but deserts, add she after but.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• "void",, put comma inside of quotes in this situation.

  I don't think this is the case per MOS:QUOTECOMMA and MOS:LQ, unless I understood it wrong. Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• desire for one, but could, remove comma.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• and the other NPCs,, with his feelings of worthlessness,, remove commas.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Background and production

• while Glitch Productions's founders Kevin and Luke Lerdwichagul, add commas after founders and Lerdwichagul.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• which she accepted., which she then accepted.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Release

• The episode, "Candy Carrier Chaos!", was released on May 3, 2024. could be probably sourced with a secondary source rather than the primary one.

  Added ComicBook.com alongside it. Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Reception

• By late November,, add year.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• it surpassed 150 million views, it had surpassed...

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• and, by February, remove comma.

  Done Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Images

• Image has proper licenses and is relevant to the topic.

Refs

• Refs are properly formatted with primary sources in a different section.
• The amount of primary sources is half of the secondary sources, hopefully more secondary sources can be provided for the article.

  I think the primary sources work well as a support for the secondary ones. I don't think more secondary sources can be added; there's not many high-quality sources talking about the series. Skyshiftertalk 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

  I added one additional source for the voice cast, and another one published just yesterday! Skyshiftertalk 18:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Spotchecks

• Manual and automated checking shows up nothing. Pass.

Misc.

• No ongoing edit war, neutral, focused on the topic, and broad in its coverage.

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

@Arconning: I believe everything has been addressed! Skyshiftertalk 18:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.