Talk:Task Force 6-26
Latest comment: 17 years ago by 12.151.212.61 in topic Task Force 121
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Task Force 6-26 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Task Force 121
editThe NYT and WP articles assert that TF 6-26 used to be called TF 121 -- is this accurate? The article currently states that 6-26 is "similar to" 121; reading the 121 article does not illuminate the issue. Are the reporters correct or did they make an error here?
TF's 121, 145 and 626 are three different units with the same mission of hunting down HVTs. The units have rotated in and out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and back for some down time in the USA with each other. 12.151.212.61 10:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Incorrect, I was attached to 121 when it changed TF designations to 6-26. 24.71.204.118 09:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
NPOV
editI added this concerning the motivation behind the creation of this article.--Storm63640 16:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate? It's a good idea to explain what is POV about an article when you add the tag, or indicate what should be addressed in order for the tag to be removed. "Drive-by" NPOV tagging is especially discouraged.--csloat 19:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)