 | The contents of the Manitoba Highway 49 page were merged into Saskatchewan Highway 49. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (February 2018) |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Saskatchewan may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge Manitoba Highway 49 to Saskatchewan Highway 49 MuzikMachine (talk) 18:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Saskatchewan Highway 49 and Manitoba Highway 49
editI was wondering if both Saskatchewan Highway 49 and Manitoba Highway 49 should be merged into one article, considering the Manitoba section is less than 1 km? If a junction list was added, it could include both. I got the idea from articles such as British Columbia Highway 15, which includes Washington State Route 543, as well as Liard Highway, which covers British Columbia Highway 77 and Northwest Territories Highway 7. The article could either still remain in Saskatchewan Highway 49 or become Highway 49 (Saskatchewan–Manitoba). Thoughts? -- MuzikMachine (talk) 22:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support - USRD has several articles that follow this convention as well (ex. State Highway 243 (Minnesota–Wisconsin)), and I think it's a good precedent when the highway has the same numbers on both sides and at least one side is especially short. - Floydian τ ¢ 14:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Concurring with Floydian here; however, I don't think the new title is necessary. I think we could just redirect the MB 49 article here and be fine. –Fredddie™ 15:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.