This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta articles
Saint John's Co-Cathedral is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
I added this information as a copy and past from the description of my own photography at the site http://www.trekearth.com, a link to the original page is here [1]. I am the author of the text and to prove this I added a small note at the bottom of the text on the page above (at the bottom of the photographs' note in italics). Please revert to the original version of this text.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The article says 1572-1577 (unsourced as far as I can tell) but I found this article [2] which says the latter dates. Which is right? BhamBoi (talk) 03:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Lonely Planet agrees with the linked article I linked. [3]. Thinking about changing it with these new sources. ANOTHER source agree with the -1578 timeframe. [4]; of the first results, all the ones with dates supported the 1573-1578 time instead of the one in the article. I'm fixing it now. BhamBoi (talk) 03:25, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply