Talk:Princess Mononoke
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Princess Mononoke article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Princess Mononoke was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 7, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference ideas for Princess Mononoke The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
The source for the Karma sub-section of the Theme section is in the text
editWhile reading I noticed that in this part the source is in the text instead of cited. I wanted to fix it, but to be honest I don't know how. Could someone do it, or tell me how to? 190.100.118.81 (talk) 02:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
"Mononoke hima" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Mononoke hima has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 21 § Mononoke hima until a consensus is reached. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Writing Workshop
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2024 and 3 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Johanande, MeeseeksEverywhere (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Daniel Yu (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
About the unreliable sources tag
editDani Cavallaro's publications have been designated as generally unreliable sources in this discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard. Citations to her work can be replaced with more high-quality ones or removed, and the tag can be taken off once complete. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)