Talk:Ohio State Route 257

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Plmerry in topic Replaced reference
Good articleOhio State Route 257 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 25, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 257/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 16:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

This has been sitting here for almost a month, and I hate when that happens, so I will review this either later today or tomorrow. TCN7JM 16:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I should note that I am delaying this review a bit because the nominator is on vacation and notified me on IRC that he most likely would not be able to respond. TCN7JM 06:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comments
  1. I might be wrong, but using "would be" in the present tense like the article does in the route description doesn't seem right.
    Changed with "is".—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 19:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
  2. I have nothing against using the traffic volume table, but did you mean to stick the 0.486 value on the end instead of near the beginning where it belongs?
    Nah, it's suppose to be there.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 19:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

These are the only comments I have. This is going on hold. TCN7JM 12:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passing. TCN7JM 22:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaced reference

edit

The ref removed meets the qualification, "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." It is also well sourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plmerry (talkcontribs) 18:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply