Talk:New Jersey Route 36

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Good articleNew Jersey Route 36 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 19, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Comments

edit

Would NJ Route 18 be considered major at NJ 36?

Nextbarker 04:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarkerReply

Yes, although it was probably originally left off due to its proximity to the parkway. Please keep in mind that there is a new standard for the links (NJ XX instead of Route XX), and that "NJ" after the town name is unnecessary on intra-state routes. -- NORTH talk 04:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

County Route 547 won't be major right, because there are no big ramps?

Nextbarker 05:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarkerReply

Why ask saying that it's not major, and then add it anyway? CR 547 is not major because it's useless to have 3 Eatontown junctions in the list. -- NORTH talk 00:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I won't add anymore shields unless I get an approval

Nextbarker 06:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarkerReply

I didn't mean that you can't add them. You can do what ever you want, as long as you allow other people to edit as well. I was just confused because you said "547 won't be major, right?", but then you added it anyway. -- NORTH talk 17:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Route 36 @ CR Route 516

edit

Would CR Route 516 be considered major at Route 36 in Hazlet?

Nextbarker 05:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarkerReply

No, because it's so close to the terminus in Keyport, and because the other junction with CR 516 in Middletown is already listed. -- NORTH talk 04:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

NJ Route 36 direction

edit

What direction does Route 36 go in N/S or E/W?

--24.228.70.72 02:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)nextbarkerReply

Merging County Route 9 (Monmouth County, New Jersey)

edit

The article County Route 9 (Monmouth County, New Jersey) should be merged into the history section of this article because it is short and basically describes the history of a part of New Jersey Route 36. Dough4872 (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merging County Route 44 (Monmouth County, New Jersey)

edit

The article County Route 44 (Monmouth County, New Jersey) should be merged into the history section of this article because it is short and basically describes the history of a part of New Jersey Route 36. Dough4872 (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have merged both articles into New Jersey Route 36 as part of the improvements to get the New Jersey Route 36 article to GA status. Dough4872 (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

USRD GA audit

edit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Dough4872 (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on New Jersey Route 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply