Talk:Mutiny of the Matoika

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 97.102.30.205 in topic And then what?
Good articleMutiny of the Matoika has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 24, 2008Good article nomineeListed
December 18, 2008Good topic candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mutiny of the Matoika/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

  • So Mutiny is just a common name for the event, which technically wasn't a mutiny? The lead might need some clarification/expansion on what exactly happened (unless the limit of what happened is they commented angrily to the AOC).
  • I think the Background section image should go in the top right corner instead.
  • "The ship chosen, Princess Matoika..." - the way this is written would imply that you've already said something about another ship being chosen.... you haven't. Basically context is needed.
  • I don't think the stuff in the References sections should be in (relatively) small print (I haven't seen any article do that in that context).
  • "the sprinters and hurdlers were provided only a 70-yard (64 m) cork track on which to practice" - should probably note that they run 100m at least in their races.
  • ""everything possible to improve conditions"" - this quote needs a reference.

And that's the lot - interesting read, so thanks for that! Please leave me a note when done with this. —Giggy 10:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Water tank photo

edit

There is no linked photo. It’s either a broken link or mis-direction. ProulxMike (talk) 17:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Cheers, —Giggy 23:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

And then what?

edit

We get to the list of demands and to whom they were circulated, and then the article skips ahead to some point "after the Olympics were over", avoiding entirely what happened when the demands were made. Were they met? Were the complainers removed from the team? Any apologies? Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I came to the Talk page to ask the exact same thing. 97.102.30.205 (talk) 19:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply