Talk:Mirabito Outdoor Classic/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Leech44 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will begin reviewing the article as soon as I can.--Dom497 (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Quality of article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Article agrees with the Manual of Style.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Checked sources and everything looks good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Every sentence in the article has at least one reference/source.
    C. No original research:  
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Article cover all the important/major content about the topic.
    B. Focused:  
    Article stays on topic at all times and has a consistent "flow".
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Took a look at the article history and everything looks stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    All images in the article are tagged and licensed properly.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Pictures are good but in my opinion, a picture what the stadium looked liked inside during the event would be great to add, yet at the same time it may be hard to find one.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Please see 6B for more info on what can be improved in the article. Also, if a picture of the inside of th stadium can't be found, this article is still worthy of a pass.--Dom497 (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I completely agree, but unfortunately I could not find any free images. I am under the impression that any non-free images would not pass fair use. I did see some images on flickr that weren't properly licensed but I'll try contacting the users to see if they would be willing to change them for use on WP. I have never had any luck with this in the past and so I wouldn't hold my breath on this, most users never even give a reply.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the review.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to say that you will be able to find a picture so I will pass the article right now!--Dom497 (talk) 20:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well I certainly hope so. Thanks again for the review and the pass.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 21:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply