Talk:Kursenieki

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 92.18.234.127 in topic Untitled

Origins

edit

The written paragraph is wishful thinking. The origins of Kursenieki are not earlier, than establishment of Duchy of Courland and Semigallia. Their occupation, that was related to sea might be Livonian influence or locally developed and living on the shore allowed them to spread as far as Danzig.

1. They do not speak language that stems from Curonian, but Latvian dialect.
2. Their DNA is very "Latvian", as they have y-dna N presence, which is in least concentration in Courland and arrived there mainly by Latvian settlers(settled there during times of Livonia).


Untitled

edit

See also Talk:Courlandians. Olessi 22:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Their origins might be in Courland... but with that "optimisation" we could merge Latin Americans and Spanish, eh? 92.18.234.127 (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Let me get this straight

edit

So there are only 9 people left on this planet that claim Kursenieki heritage? That is amazing if true. Those 9 people need to find each other and start making babies... fast! --Tocino 07:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kursenieki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply