Talk:Kalimpong/GA2

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
A GA from 2009 that was once an FA. It has not been maintained to standards. Opening an individual GAR for 1 week to see if anyone will answer. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

• Keep honestly, I think the fact that it was once an FA has helped it. Only one or two uncited paragraphs, which I have smoothened or cut; references appear to be of good quality. Compared to some other GARs, this is rather good. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

  there is still quite a lot of uncited material, even with your edits. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

  @Onegreatjoke: could you make a decision here? I'd say delist, based on the economy section not being up-to-date ("The town—earlier an important trade post between India and Tibet—hopes to boost its economy after the reopening of the Nathu La (pass) in April 2006".). Femke (alt) (talk) 10:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.