Talk:Interstate 73 in North Carolina

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Washuotaku in topic Merge

Merge

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to not merge the articles. WashuOtaku (talk) 03:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't think I-73 will ever be finished. All info is already in parent article, as such I think we should merge as I-73 is only Start class although this is only C class. --Hurricane Tracker 495 20:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Support without prejudice to re-splitting in the future. I would rather we maintain one page now and then split out S-D articles in the distant future. –Fredddie 22:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • As a procedural note, the initiator of this discussion has been blocked as a sockpuppet. But regardless I would say oppose because not only do these subarticles exist, but they already have a significant amount of text. --Rschen7754 07:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Not sure if we are still discussing this, I just came across it. I get the argument, however, I do think it's more likely than not that South Carolina will build its section and I do think Virginia may eventually complete the Interstate to Roanoke. So I think a state article in NC, SC, and VA at least is warranted. I also feel like keeping the NC section in the main article is quite broad when officially the highway will run from Myrtle Beach to Michigan and there is no certainty that the highway will never be built. That is just my preference I guess.--Ncchild (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.