Talk:Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel/GA1
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Vacant0 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Famous Hobo (talk · contribs) 02:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 16:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Initial comments
edit- There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 29.6% in similarity.
- There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
- The article is stable.
- No previous GA reviews.
General comments
edit- Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
- No issues were found in the lede.
- The rest of the article also looks good. I did not find any grammar errors.
- Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
- Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
- References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
- No referencing issues.
- Listed references are reliable. Good job on archiving.
- Spotchecked Ref 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 13, 16, 22, 23, 31, 32–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
- Composers (in the infobox) are not mentioned in the text and are not sourced.
- Copyvio already checked.
- Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
- The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
- Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
- The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
- Checking whether the article is stable.
- As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
- Checking images.
- All looks good.
Final comments
edit@Famous Hobo: Everything appears to be okay. I'll promote the article when the composers get added to the text, with a reference backing up that of course. I'll put the review on hold for a week. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)