Talk:County of Washington v. Gunther

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Typo?

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"It also argued that under the Bennett Amendment, the women could claim unlawful pay discrimination unless they showed under the Fair Labor Standards Act that they were doing "equal work.""

I very strongly suspect that this should say 'could not.' The text of the ruling reads, in part, "The District Court rejected this claim, ruling as a matter of law that a sex-based wage discrimination claim cannot be brought under Title VII unless it would satisfy the equal work standard of the Equal Pay Act. The Court of Appeals reversed." 2600:1011:B11E:BDC:F4CB:2662:30FD:10A5 (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic